Strong foundations
Relevant policy or practice is present and can support a next step.
What the audit examines
Nine dimensions. Evidence judged in context.
The framework connects leadership, curriculum, teaching and community practice. Each question is assessed independently so one strong policy cannot conceal an unrelated evidence gap.
The framework
Nine dimensions of AI literacy
How evidence is read
Missing evidence is not weak practice.
The audit reports only what the supplied corpus can establish. It does not treat omitted documents as proof that an activity does not happen.
Explicit AI practice
The supplied evidence shows what happens, for whom and how it is checked.
Not yet established
The supplied material cannot support a reliable maturity judgement yet.
Conflicting evidence
Sources disagree, so the conflict remains visible for human review.
International alignment
Global guidance, kept in its proper role.
DEEP uses governed, versioned reference material from organisations including OECD, UNESCO and the European Commission to support question design and interpretation.
PISA 2029 Media and Artificial Intelligence Literacy remains a draft assessment lens. It is not presented as a final curriculum or a school compliance standard.
International sources can inform the audit, but they cannot substitute for evidence of what happens in the school. Local legal and regulatory requirements remain separately scoped.
See how the framework enters the improvement loop