Resource Pack
Everything your centre needs to maintain assessment integrity in the age of AI. Aligned to JCQ Revision 2 guidance, this pack includes malpractice risk registers, coursework authentication frameworks, candidate declaration forms, staff and student briefings, and a complete compliance checklist.
Less than the cost of one hour’s consultancy. Enough to get your centre JCQ Revision 2 compliant.
£79 is what a school pays for half a day of supply cover. This pack gives you 14 professionally written, fully editable resources — policies, risk registers, student declarations, staff and student briefings — that would take weeks to develop from scratch.
| What you’d otherwise need | Estimated cost |
|---|---|
| Consultant-drafted centre AI assessment policy | £400–£700 |
| External CPD on AI and assessment integrity | £300–£600 |
| Coursework authentication framework development | £500–£800 |
| Malpractice investigation protocol drafting | £300–£500 |
| SLT time researching JCQ requirements and creating materials | 3–5 days |
| AI & Assessment Integrity Resource Pack | £79 |
Consultant-drafted centre AI assessment policy
£400–£700
External CPD on AI and assessment integrity
£300–£600
Coursework authentication framework development
£500–£800
Malpractice investigation protocol drafting
£300–£500
SLT time researching JCQ requirements and creating materials
3–5 days
AI & Assessment Integrity Resource Pack
£79
Schools typically spend £1,500–£3,000 on external consultancy for assessment policy reviews. This pack delivers JCQ-aligned templates, authentication frameworks, and training sessions for £79 — and you keep everything forever.
14 professionally designed, fully editable files covering a centre AI assessment policy, malpractice risk register, detection and investigation protocols, coursework authentication framework, candidate declaration forms, staff briefing with facilitator guide, marking guidance, GCSE and A-Level/IB student presentations, an academic integrity pledge, and JCQ Revision 2 compliance checklist.
5
Policy Templates
6
CPD Resources
2
Implementation Tools
1
Quick-Start Guide
5 files
Pre-formatted risk register for documenting AI-related malpractice risks across exam subjects, tracking likelihood, impact, mitigations, and review dates.
Ready-to-adopt centre-level policy on AI use in assessed work, aligned to JCQ Revision 2 requirements. Covers permitted use, authentication procedures, and staff responsibilities.
Step-by-step protocol for detecting and investigating suspected AI misuse in student work, including evidence gathering, escalation pathways, and documentation requirements.
Comprehensive framework for authenticating coursework and NEA submissions in an AI-enabled environment. Includes checkpoint procedures and verification strategies.
Declaration form for candidates to sign confirming their AI use in assessed work. Covers disclosure requirements, permitted tools, and academic integrity commitments.
6 files
Presentation for briefing all teaching staff on AI and assessment integrity, covering JCQ requirements, detection approaches, and what’s expected when supervising assessed work.
Detailed facilitator guide for the staff briefing session with timing prompts, discussion points, anticipated questions, and follow-up actions.
Practical guide for markers and assessors on evaluating student work where AI tools may have been used. Covers red flags, authentication techniques, and professional judgement frameworks.
Age-appropriate presentation for GCSE students on academic integrity, permitted AI use in coursework and NEA, and the consequences of malpractice.
Advanced presentation for A-Level and IB students covering academic integrity expectations, AI declaration requirements, and responsible AI use in extended essays and coursework.
Student pledge document for signing at the start of each assessment cycle, confirming understanding of academic integrity expectations and AI use boundaries.
2 files
Structured checklist mapping your current assessment practices against JCQ Revision 2 AI requirements. Identifies gaps and prioritises actions for compliance.
Department-level audit spreadsheet for reviewing AI use across assessment types, subjects, and year groups. Tracks authentication methods and compliance status.
1 file
Quick-start guide explaining how to get the most from this assessment integrity resource pack, suggested implementation sequence, and customisation tips.
Ensure your centre meets JCQ Revision 2 requirements with ready-made policies, compliance checklists, and malpractice documentation.
Run the department AI assessment audit to review authentication methods across subjects and ensure consistent practice.
Use the authentication framework and candidate declaration forms to protect the integrity of every submission.
Use the JCQ Revision 2 Compliance Checklist (I1) to identify where your current assessment practices fall short of the updated requirements.
Customise the Centre AI Assessment Policy (T2), Detection & Investigation Protocol (T3), and Coursework Authentication Framework (T4) with your centre branding.
Deliver the staff briefing (C1) with the facilitator guide, share the marking guidance (C2), and run age-appropriate student sessions (C3a–C3b). Have students sign the Academic Integrity Pledge (C3c) and Candidate Declaration Form (T5).
Use the Department AI Assessment Audit (I2) and Malpractice Risk Register (T1) to track compliance across subjects and review dates throughout the assessment cycle.
JCQ’s updated AI guidance is in effect now. Centres need compliant policies, authentication procedures, and candidate declarations in place for every assessed submission.
AI-related malpractice investigations are increasing across all exam boards. Without clear detection protocols and documentation, your centre is exposed.
Coursework and NEA submissions happen throughout the year. Waiting until summer to address AI integrity means a full cycle of unprotected assessments.
Get 14 professionally designed, fully editable resources for £79.School Plan subscribers pay just £47.40 (40% off).
Sign up to purchaseDeploy these resources across multiple centres in your trust or consultancy portfolio. Every template is fully editable and rebrandable.